<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-Ray scanners at airports &#8211; More big brother and a cancer risk too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingbollocks.net/2009/10/13/x-ray-scanners-at-airports-more-big-brother-and-a-cancer-risk-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/2009/10/13/x-ray-scanners-at-airports-more-big-brother-and-a-cancer-risk-too/</link>
	<description>The Nature of Now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty Bollinger</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/2009/10/13/x-ray-scanners-at-airports-more-big-brother-and-a-cancer-risk-too/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty Bollinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?p=1254#comment-405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My bad. The radiation being used in these “full-body-porno” scanners is terahertz radiation and not typical ionizing radiation.

But a study conducted by Boian Alexandrov (and colleagues) at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico indicated that terahertz radiation has the potential to literally rip apart or unzip double-stranded DNA. This, in turn, creates bubbles that could interfere with critical processes (like DNA replication and gene expression).

I don’t really don’t mind being exposed nude for the TSA-Pervs, but having my DNA unraveled...that’s another issue altogether!! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad. The radiation being used in these “full-body-porno” scanners is terahertz radiation and not typical ionizing radiation.</p>
<p>But a study conducted by Boian Alexandrov (and colleagues) at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico indicated that terahertz radiation has the potential to literally rip apart or unzip double-stranded DNA. This, in turn, creates bubbles that could interfere with critical processes (like DNA replication and gene expression).</p>
<p>I don’t really don’t mind being exposed nude for the TSA-Pervs, but having my DNA unraveled&#8230;that’s another issue altogether!! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty Bollinger</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/2009/10/13/x-ray-scanners-at-airports-more-big-brother-and-a-cancer-risk-too/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty Bollinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?p=1254#comment-404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. At best, this is intrusive and unethical, and at worst, illegal. Isn’t it illegal to expose people to radiation without medical justification? How is the government allowed to x-ray us “willy-nilly” at the airports? Have they considered the deleterious effects on women in their first trimester of pregnancy, when DNA damage (caused by radiation) is most likely to result in genetic abnormalities?

Dr. John W. Gofman, an authority on the health effects of ionizing radiation, estimates that 75% of breast cancer could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing radiation. His exhaustive research led him to conclude that there is NO SAFE DOSE-LEVEL of ionizing radiation, since it is equivalent to dropping &quot;grenades and small bombs&quot; on human cells.

These full-body x-ray machines should be banned. Radiation damages the DNA in your cells and much more. It accumulates in the body during one&#039;s lifetime and when it reaches a certain level, cancer is nearly certain. No matter what anyone tells you and no matter how they try to “down-play” the danger, just know that there is NO SAFE DOSE of radiation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. At best, this is intrusive and unethical, and at worst, illegal. Isn’t it illegal to expose people to radiation without medical justification? How is the government allowed to x-ray us “willy-nilly” at the airports? Have they considered the deleterious effects on women in their first trimester of pregnancy, when DNA damage (caused by radiation) is most likely to result in genetic abnormalities?</p>
<p>Dr. John W. Gofman, an authority on the health effects of ionizing radiation, estimates that 75% of breast cancer could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing radiation. His exhaustive research led him to conclude that there is NO SAFE DOSE-LEVEL of ionizing radiation, since it is equivalent to dropping &#8220;grenades and small bombs&#8221; on human cells.</p>
<p>These full-body x-ray machines should be banned. Radiation damages the DNA in your cells and much more. It accumulates in the body during one&#8217;s lifetime and when it reaches a certain level, cancer is nearly certain. No matter what anyone tells you and no matter how they try to “down-play” the danger, just know that there is NO SAFE DOSE of radiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT scans equivalent to about 100 chest X-rays &#171; Talking Bollocks</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/2009/10/13/x-ray-scanners-at-airports-more-big-brother-and-a-cancer-risk-too/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CT scans equivalent to about 100 chest X-rays &#171; Talking Bollocks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?p=1254#comment-361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] airport x-ray, cat scan, ct scans, radiation, x rays, x-ray machines       Following on from my article about X Ray machines being intrusions into our privacy and potential cancer risks I read an article [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] airport x-ray, cat scan, ct scans, radiation, x rays, x-ray machines       Following on from my article about X Ray machines being intrusions into our privacy and potential cancer risks I read an article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

