Archive for the 'Sport' Category

10
Sep
12

Paralympic Medal table by GDP and Population

The Olympics are over, long live the Olympics! I was interested to see that the medal table for the Paralympics. Ranking by total medals, China was at the top, then Russia then Great Britain and then The United States. Well done all of them. I have to admit that the Paralympics have made me view the “disabled” in a different light. These guys are far more energetic and determined than I will ever be. Indeed, the ubiquitous overexcitement fist waving and overzealous exhalations of victory by the disabled has liberated me to dislike disabled sportsman as much as I dislike any other sports bores.

I have to admit I was surprised to see China at the top as, though I knew they’d made a big effort, I hadn’t realised that they’d made a big Paralympic effort. Russia too. Looking down the medal table got me thinking. Always dangerous……

Plucky little Cuba and New Zealand down there with 17 medals. Good for them. Not as great an achievement as China or Russia but……..hang on…..New Zealand and Cuba have miniscule populations compared with China and their economies are not nearly as great.

Obviously rich countries will do better as they have the lolly to throw at the games. The real test is not how much money you have but what you make of it. I collected some data and created a table which lists countries and their medal totals. I added a column for the country’s Gross Domestic Product which, for those uninterested in economics, is a measure of a country’s wealth. I added another column for a country’s population. I then added extra columns for “ratios” which I calculated by dividing the country’s total medals by it’s GDP or population and then multiplying by a fudge factor to get the numbers into a readable format. (ie. Not so small that they are lots of leading zeros).

More specifically the Population Ratio is the total medals divided by population and multiplied by 10,000,000. The GDP Ratio is the total medals divided by GDP and multiplied by 100,000. I then added extra columns showing ranking by Population Ratio or GDP Ratio.

I should say that I had “issues” obtaining information for all countries. China seems to score Hong King separately, Britain has it’s usual schizophrenia about whether it is The UK or Great Britain and “the former” Yugoslavia seems in a constant state of flux. However, I cobbled the data from Wikipedia together the best I could (well, as quickly as possible) and made a few assumptions.

The results are quite revealing.

Cuba and New Zealand’s efforts are actually more impressive than China, Russia, Britain or the USA. New Zealand ranks 1st by Population Ratio and 11th by GDP ratio. Cuba ranks 5th by GDP Ratio and 13th by Population Ratio. Other notable items are that Fiji is 4th by GDP ratio, Ireland is 3rd by Population Ratio and Iceland 4th by Population Ratio.

And Britain? Well we didn’t do so bad after all. Britain is 1st by GDP ratio and 5th by Population Ratio. On the other hand, India’s performance was dismal. Bottom by total medals, by GDP ratio and by Population Ratio.

Country Rank by Gold Gold Silver Bronze Total Rank by Total Medals Population Population Ratio Rank by Pop Ratio GDP (USD) GDP Ratio Rank by GDP ratio
Britain 3 34 43 43 120 2 45561989 26.34 5 137936 87 1
Ukraine 4 32 24 28 84 6 45561989 18.44 7 137936 60.9 2
Tunisia 14 9 5 5 19 19 10673800 17.8 8 44252 42.94 3
Fiji 52 1 0 0 1 62 876000 11.42 19 3052 32.77 4
Cuba 15 9 5 3 17 21 11247925 15.11 13 64220 26.47 5
Azerbaijan 27 4 5 3 12 30 9235100 12.99 15 51797 23.17 6
Kenya 40 2 2 2 6 41 38610097 1.55 54 32483 18.47 7
Belarus 25 5 2 3 10 35 9457500 10.57 23 54713 18.28 8
Namibia 47 1 1 0 2 54 2104900 9.5 27 11701 17.09 9
Serbia 39 2 3 0 5 45 7120666 7.02 34 37713 13.26 10
New Zealand 21 6 7 4 17 22 4440700 38.28 1 141406 12.02 11
Algeria 26 4 6 9 19 20 37100000 5.12 38 158650 11.98 12
Macedonia 52 1 0 0 1 63 2059794 4.85 40 9138 10.94 13
Hungary 38 2 6 6 14 26 9957731 14.06 14 128629 10.88 14
Iraq 59 0 2 1 3 49 33330000 0.9 62 28141 10.66 15
Latvia 47 1 1 0 2 55 2070371 9.66 26 24014 8.33 16
Croatia 58 0 2 3 5 46 4290612 11.65 18 60852 8.22 17
South Africa 18 8 12 9 29 14 50586757 5.73 37 363704 7.97 18
Iceland 52 1 0 0 1 64 320060 31.24 4 12574 7.95 19
Ireland 19 8 3 5 16 23 4588252 34.87 3 206600 7.74 20
Poland 9 14 13 9 36 12 38538447 9.34 28 469393 7.67 21
Jamaica 52 1 0 0 1 65 2709300 3.69 44 13428 7.45 22
Egypt 28 4 4 7 15 25 82502000 1.82 52 215272 6.97 23
Russia 2 36 38 28 102 3 143142000 7.13 33 1479823 6.89 24
Slovakia 41 2 1 3 6 42 5445324 11.02 22 87263 6.88 25
Australia 5 32 23 30 85 5 22719766 37.41 2 1271945 6.68 26
Nigeria 22 6 5 2 13 27 166629000 0.78 63 196410 6.62 27
Morocco 37 3 0 3 6 43 32660800 1.84 51 91542 6.55 28
Bulgaria 59 0 2 1 3 50 7364570 4.07 42 47702 6.29 29
Iran 11 10 7 7 24 17 1210193422 0.2 72 386670 6.21 30
Bosnia and Herzegovina 52 1 0 0 1 66 3868621 2.58 48 16837 5.94 31
Czech Republic 42 1 6 4 11 34 10507566 10.47 24 197674 5.56 32
Hong Kong 34 3 3 6 12 31 7103700 16.89 9 224459 5.35 33
Netherlands 10 10 10 19 39 11 16740554 23.3 6 779310 5 34
Cyprus 67 0 1 0 1 67 838897 11.92 17 22957 4.36 35
China 1 95 71 65 231 1 1347350000 1.71 53 5739358 4.02 36
Greece 44 1 3 8 12 32 10787690 11.12 20 301065 3.99 37
Ethiopia 67 0 1 0 1 68 84320987 0.12 73 26928 3.71 38
Israel 45 1 2 5 8 37 7900600 10.13 25 217445 3.68 39
Austria 30 4 3 6 13 28 8452835 15.38 12 379047 3.43 40
Spain 17 8 18 16 42 10 46163116 9.1 29 1407322 2.98 41
Republic of Korea 12 9 9 9 27 16 1210193422 0.22 71 1014369 2.66 42
Sweden 29 4 4 4 12 33 9514406 12.61 16 458725 2.62 43
Uzbekistan 67 0 1 0 1 69 29559100 0.34 70 39173 2.55 44
Finland 32 4 1 1 6 44 5418430 11.07 21 238731 2.51 45
Thailand 31 4 2 2 8 38 65479453 1.22 59 318850 2.51 46
Switzerland 33 3 6 4 13 29 7952600 16.35 10 527920 2.46 47
Angola 51 1 0 1 2 56 20609294 0.97 61 82470 2.43 48
Slovenia 67 0 1 0 1 70 2050189 4.88 39 46906 2.13 49
Brazil 7 21 14 8 43 9 193946886 2.22 49 2088966 2.06 50
Mexico 23 6 4 11 21 18 112336538 1.87 50 1032224 2.03 51
Sri Lanka 74 0 0 1 1 71 20277597 0.49 67 49549 2.02 52
Germany 8 18 26 22 66 7 81844000 8.06 32 3280334 2.01 53
Canada 20 7 15 9 31 13 34908900 8.88 31 1577040 1.97 54
Norway 35 3 2 3 8 39 5032600 15.9 11 413056 1.94 55
France 16 8 19 18 45 8 65350000 6.89 35 2559850 1.76 56
Denmark 50 1 0 4 5 47 5584758 8.95 30 309866 1.61 57
Belgium 36 3 1 3 7 40 10839905 6.46 36 469347 1.49 58
Italy 13 9 8 11 28 15 59464644 4.71 41 2051290 1.36 59
Turkey 43 1 5 4 10 36 74724269 1.34 55 734440 1.36 60
Argentina 62 0 1 4 5 48 40117096 1.25 58 370263 1.35 61
Portugal 63 0 1 2 3 51 10561614 2.84 47 228859 1.31 62
Romania 47 1 1 0 2 57 19042936 1.05 60 161629 1.24 63
United Arab Emirates 46 1 1 1 3 52 8264070 3.63 45 297648 1.01 64
Singapore 65 0 1 1 2 58 5183700 3.86 43 222699 0.9 65
Malaysia 65 0 1 1 2 59 29467000 0.68 65 237797 0.84 66
Colombia 61 0 2 0 2 60 46683000 0.43 68 288086 0.69 67
USA 6 31 29 38 98 4 314303000 3.12 46 14447100 0.68 68
Taiwan 63 0 1 2 3 53 22805547 1.32 56 466832 0.64 69
Venezuela 73 0 0 2 2 61 27150095 0.74 64 391307 0.51 70
Chile 52 1 0 0 1 72 17402630 0.57 66 203443 0.49 71
Japan 24 5 5 6 16 24 127570000 1.25 57 5458873 0.29 72
Saudi Arabia 67 0 1 0 1 73 27136977 0.37 69 434666 0.23 73
Indonesia 74 0 0 1 1 74 237424569 0.04 74 707448 0.14 74
India 67 0 1 0 1 75 1210193422 0.01 75 1722328 0.06 75
By beautiful Prints online

By beautiful Prints online

About these ads
09
Aug
12

Sport! – What is it good for?

Just Another Corporate Logo

Just Another Corporate Logo

The Man On The Radio (TMOTR) said that, years ago, lack of funds had meant the British Olympic effort was quite amateurish whereas now, thanks to Lottery funding, we can afford the best trainers, the bet “sports scientists” and the best equipment. Consequently we have one of the best medal counts after China and the U.S, countries which also throw money at sport.

I suspect that most countries have more sense than money these days and so can’t afford this sort of behaviour. However, once the world economy picks up, perhaps the competition for the best will increase? Perhaps the Germans will decide that they must “invest” limitless funds in their team? Maybe they will try and attract the best trainers from the British or Chinese? If this happens then Olympics sport will become very much like Premier League football with personnel changing teams solely for money.

Except the athletes, of course, they must be nationals of the country in whose team they compete. But even here there is wriggle room. The Daily Mail recently ran an article about “Plastic Brits” claiming that Ukrainian wrestler Olga Butkevych only received her UK passport a couple of months prior to the start of the 2012 Olympics. The Daily Mail has a reputation for xenophobia but, though they may overstate the case, some athletes do change nationality in order to get a place in Olympics teams. It was the Daily Mail who helped start this trend when they persuaded the father of South African runner Zola Budd to encourage her to apply for British citizenship in order to compete for Britain in the 1984 Olympics.

If we are to run National Olympic teams as if they are multi-national corporations then why not? Better still, let’s throw away these idiotic scruples about commercialism and let the sponsors fund Olympic teams directly? Coca Cola could do a deal with a small bankrupt country, such as Greece, to bail them out providing that the Greeks relax their immigration rules and allow citizenship for the world’s best athletes. The athletes would need to be paid higher salaries than other countries in order to overcome their heartfelt nationalistic fervour.

At a stroke we would have achieved the rebirth of the Greek Olympic tradition as well as digging them out of their current economic funk. Greece would leapfrog the UK to the top of the medal table of corporate nations which have allowed hyper-commercialism to displace democracy. Faust was small fry compared to this!

st malo beach

St Malo Beach

01
Aug
12

Militarising the Olympics

Militaristic?

The arrival of the head of the British armed forces

It can be no mystery to followers of Talking Bollocks that I abhor sport. Sure I dabble at sailing but mainly for the fresh air and pretty colours. If truth be known, the sound I find most irritating is that of an overexcited football commentator bawling his stupid head off because a man in shorts has kicked a ball into a large net.

Last Friday I arranged to meet some friends at a pub in London and was told that we had a table and could watch the Olympics Games opening ceremony starting at 9pm. My heart sank. The installation of TV in pubs is a disaster to rank alongside the invention of marketing and I anticipated an evening watching boring people do boring things.

I arrived early and we had a few drinks. The ceremony started with a lot of silly shepherds and I mainly ignored it. I shall not bother you with the cliched story of how my interest was, at first piqued, and then enthralled. Early commentary had contrasted the London extravaganza with the opening ceremony in Beijing four years earlier which was said to be a very militaristic affair. I applauded the difference. I loved the anarchic, individualistic, irreverence of London. In short I ended the evening in a state of over-sentimental patriotic idiocy as was, no doubt, the intention of the now God-like Danny Boil.

I am not now converted to the cause of sport but I have been paying more attention than I would normally have done and it seems to be going reasonably well. If nothing else it has achieved something I have long wished for which is the eradication of the surfeit of tourists in our capital city.

I have heard that many Olympic events have left numerous seats unoccupied and and that the army have been called upon to fill the seats. I guess this was inevitable after they were called in to handle security. It does seem to be setting a pattern though especially as The Queen is head of the British Armed forces and was escorted to the opening ceremony by a (fictional) Royal Navy Commander.

I wonder……since the failure to supply adequate refreshment at several equestrienne events, why not get the army in to do the catering too? In fact…..after today’s banning of several badminton players, perhaps we might even start replacing individual competitors with soldiers? Danny Boyle and Sebastian Coe could be given honorary ranks in the SAS and, by the time of the closing ceremony, we might achieve a 100% militarised Games?

The British have a general tendency to drag up The Second World War at the drop of a hat and, now I think back, didn’t I hear the strains of either 633 Squadron or The Damn Busters during the opening performance? Perhaps the contrast with the Beijing games is not so great after all?

Yachts

Yachts

20
Jul
12

Bribery – The Official Sponsorship method of the London Olympics

London Olympics - Sold Out

London Olympics – Sold Out

The woman on the BBC2 program Newsnight yesterday said that visitors to the London Olympics wont be able to buy pints of British bitter because some bloody lager company has obtained “sole pouring rights” at all Olympic venues.

What utter BOLLOCKS! When did the concept of “sole pouring rights” appear in British law?

This evening’s BBC Radio 4 PM program reported that to buy Olympics tickets one must have a Visa card and that this will be the only card accepted in the Olympics area! Credit/Charge cards now form an intrinsic and necessary part of the money system in Western countries and to allow a monopoly in this area is atrocious. The board of the Olympics Organising Committee (IOC) have obviously confused sponsorship with bribery. The Deputy Chair of the IOC is Sir Keith Mills who has worked extensively in the the loyalty card industry. It will be interesting to keep an eye on his future career choices.

It’s not just beer and cards of course, Powerade is the “official Sports Drink” of the London Olympics. Leaving aside the ludicrous claims that a fizzy drink has anything to do with sport, what does it mean to be an “official” sports drink? Are the Olympics athletes obliged to consume this stuff? Are the officials obliged to consume it?

In fact, what does it mean to be a sponsor? In the case of the Olympics the word “sponsor” has two meanings. First it means that Coca-Cola, the owner of Powerade, have paid the Olympics organisers to use the Olympic branding material. The word sponsor is used here incorrectly as this is merely a commercial transaction.

When some bloke asks me to give £10 to a cancer charity providing that he runs a marathon, that is sponsorship. If I demand that he only wear clothes made by my company then it is no longer sponsorship, it is a commercial transaction. He is earning money by selling me advertising space and the fact that he donates part of his money to charity reflects well on him but, as the advertiser, my motives are commercial not charitable. I am not a sponsor, he is.

The second meaning of “sponsor” is worse. In the UK we have various laws ensuring competition and a level playing field for wholesalers to get their products to consumers. But, as with many supposed sponsorship deals, the organisers of The London Olympics have somehow insisted that normal free market competition rules are waived and that corporations are granted monopolies. One has to ask: Who gave the IOC the right to suspend British and European trade rules?

Corporate sponsorship is a questionable activity as any contribution made by corporations is met by shareholders or customers who may be oblivious to the costs incurred. A quick perusal of the web reveals that the legal authorities are becoming aware of the slippery slope from sponsorship into bribery. In October 2011 the Stuttgart Public Prosecutor’s Office filed an indictment against Volkswagen employees in connection with T-Systems’ sponsorship of the VfL Wolfsburg football club and specialist marketing companies are monitoring the effect of UK 2010 Bribery law on the sponsorship industry.

The absence of British beer brands at a major international event hosted by the UK in London is yet another example of how the corrupt and greedy British elite have sold out our culture for cash. It’s notable that the London Olympics web site does not refer to firms donating money as sponsors but as “partners”, a term usually reserved for the owners of giant business consultancies such as Deloitte who, incidentally, are another Olympic partner.

Father of Olympic branding: my rules are being abused

Roses

Roses

12
Dec
11

Wingsuit fly past

01
Jul
10

Chill out Murray and have some fun

Yesterday afternoon I watched the tennis. Britain’s Andy Murray played Jo Tsonga of France. Tsonga started well but Murray eventually came out on top. I found Murray’s aggressive and triumphalist shouting and fist shaking very unattractive. He certainly has an appallingly big and ugly gob which aught to remain shut lest people compare him with the Alien. I think Tim Henman had a penchant for this sort of behaviour too and I’ve noticed it with various British and American sportsman. Pondering this likeness for a while it occurred to me that The Alien is like Henman in that he always looks like he is about to make a come back and win but he always loses in the end.

The Alien - - - - - - - - - - Andy Murray

The Alien - - - - - - - - - - Andy Murray

Presumably this overt display of aggression stems from the self image of many American men. To quote General Stanley McChrystal:Figure out how your enemy operates, be faster and more ruthless than everybody else, then take the fuckers out.”.

Yeh, thanks for that Stan, is there someone else we can talk to?

Years ago I worked for the  investment bank Credit Suisse First Boston and there was an American manager there who proclaimed “Business is War”. Of course the manager was TALKING BOLLOCKS. Business is not war “Business is business”. I’d even take issue with the old saying, “business before pleasure” preferring  the Thai attitude to life where anything worth doing, including work, should have some element of “Sanuk” ( fun ).

So should war also have a sense of fun? Perhaps that is taking it too far but certainly there is no need for the ugly rantings of Murray in sport.

A week or so ago I watched Japan play in the World Cup. I was impressed, when they scored they actually appeared happy! They smiled!! They had scored another goal. Surely this was a more normal and healthy reaction to success than the yobish behaviour displayed by Andy Murray.

I think that I prefer amateur sports. Recently I played table tennis with a friend and her two kids. We had four balls going at once and  every time one ball was missed we threw another one onto the table. I don’t know who won but it was good fun.

st malo beach

St Malo Beach

28
Jun
10

Carry on England

Carry On England

Carry On England

As I walked along Western Road in Hove on Sunday afternoon the sun shone, flowers adorned the pubs and the pavements thronged with England supporters. Optimism was in the air.

At 3pm I switched on the box and saw that Carry On Up The Kyber was just about to start on Channel 4. For a joke, I texted a friend to suggest he watch it. He replied that if I only watch one game this year then England vs. Germany should be it. Needless to say, I watched the game.

From the start, all the action was in the England half yet the English defence seemed thin on the ground. After England went two nil down I felt I couldn’t watch any more and switched channels to find Kenneth Williams as the The Khasi of Kalabar encouraging a bunch of Indian “Burpers” to fight the British. The Burpers refuse, claiming that it was a well known fact that the British were invincible. A pity the Germans didn’t think so.

About this time a cheer went up from the pub outside my flat and I, hurriedly (and guiltily), switched back to the game. England had scored and the commentary was claiming that England had come alive. Within minutes came the disallowed England goal and the commentary quickly focused on this setback and forgot the game in hand. Suddenly Germany scored again and by Germany’s 4th goal the commentators were speculating over the future of English football. England staggered on to a shameful 4 -1 defeat.

The analysis started Immediately and today The Sun described the disallowed goal as “a red herring which merely papers over the cavernous cracks in England’s display” – Excellent! Much of the criticism seems to come down to the accusation that the system fails to nurture new talent, preferring to buy it in from abroad.

I agree that this is part of the problem and I suggest that another part of the problem is the egocentric, “me first” nature of English football. Everyone wants to be a star but without commitment to the team.

Consider my own actions when England went 2 – o down. Rather than sticking with them I had switched channels and the commentators had practically given up all hope when Germany got their third goal. Can you imagine the Koreans, the Japanese or the Americans giving up so quickly?

All this probably reflects Britain’s comparative decline in the world and the wider British culture. We expect that we should be amongst the top rank and when we’re not we lose heart. We need to take a good look in the mirror.

Other nations, with less baggage, will see each success as a step forward and each defeat as a warning against complacency. England seldom displays such purpose or determination and oscillates between euphoria and despair. We see success as proof of innate superiority and defeat as an inevitable nail in our coffin.

When England succeeds we proclaim our team as heroes but when England fail we crucify them. A so called football supporter supports nothing more than a dream. He does not even support his local club; instead he picks a Premier League side which employs a bunch of foreigners to entertain him while he drinks. The premier league has no allegiance to England or English football and it has no supporters. The Premier League has merely an international TV audience of customers bound together by their shared purchase of associated merchandising. The Premier league is to football what Hollywood is to film: superficial, over paid and lacking soul.

Both the obsession with instant stardom and the tendency to buy in talent from abroad are not limited to football. British business lobbies government to allow immigration of workers with required skills while education and training are neglected and the X-Factor encourages youngsters to believe they can become stars over night.

Football was part of our nation’s soul but we have sold our soul to pay for replica kit, Sky Sports and holidays in Tenerife.

Come on England? – More like Carry On England!

09
Jun
09

Embarrassing Seagulls

Isn’t it about time to recognise Pythonesque features in Cantona’s feathered friend. Hasn’t his seagull followed its last trawler? Isn’t it appearing decidedly nailed to its perch. Frankly, we have been propping it up for far to long and I’m feeling quite as sick as the hapless Norwegian Blue did before it ‘joined the bleedin’ choir invisible’.
Let’s examine this odd bird. 17 or so years ago Cantona used a simple metaphor. What on earth is going on in philistine Britain that we still want to scratch our heads? Are we ‘bird brains?’ Cantona made a perfectly straightforward, albeit figurative statement to the effect that ‘the press are scavengers’ and we descend into awe at the incomprehensible obscurantism of a Gallic genius. At the time I was reasonably comfortable with the idea that Cantona had said something a little unusual for a man of his profession: that he had risen a little above his fellows in revealing that he could string a sentence together; even, let’s give him his due, a quite entertaining little metaphor about the vagaries of the British tabloid press. But to hold it up as some incomprehensible jewel of deep philosophical profundity is frankly embarrassing.

Seagulls

Seagulls

Lets deconstruct it a little to follow in the footsteps of a Foucault or a Baudrillard.

“when the seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea”.

The seagulls are the press – the sardines stories, Cantona is the trawler: end of.

How difficult do we think this is? I am truly astonished that perfectly intelligent (one presumes) commentators and journalists continue to resurrect Eric’s quip as if it was drawn from the depths of French intellectual tradition to take its place as an unfathomable mystery of our time. ‘What could he possibly mean?’ our perplexity grows and the mystery deepens.

Perhaps if he had said, ‘the press are like a rats going through my bins’ he may have inspired less awe. Perhaps it was his heavy french accent. Maybe it gave the squawking metaphor something of ‘a lovely plumage’ denied to more home grown breeds. But whatever it was it’s got to stop.

Now, please don’t take this as a criticism of Cantona. Were that everyone expressed themselves with a little elegance and intelligence (I won’t dwell on the karate kick incident that led to Eric’s delusion that he was being hounded). Indeed, I shouldn’t wonder if Eric himself has come to view the seabird as more of an albatross everytime he sets foot in Britain. For my part I am simply ashamed as we cry out to our near neighbours across the channel; ‘look at us, we’re stupid!’ Yes, it was a little bit clever for a footballer judging by the normal post match comments – but not for most of us. We do know what it means, its not that tricky – please stop going on about it because it makes us look like morons. The press followed Eric around because they expected to get a story; doh, doh, doh! We got it at the time and we still get it. We are not a nation of idiots! Stop telling us that we are bewildered, confounded or otherwise perplexed after all this time
by something that never baffled us in the first place. Why do we want to appear stupid?
Throwing sardines to the dead gull should cease, it must go to meet its maker.

I’ll leave you with a proper bit of obscure French philosophising. This one from the pen of Jean-Paul Sartre and I hang my head in shame, in advance, toward all those of you who find these words equally straightforward.

“My position in the midst of the world is defined by the relation between the instrumental utility or adversity in the realities which surround me and my own facticity; that is the discovery of the dangers which I risk in the world, of the obstacles which I can encounter there, the aid which can be offered me, all in the light of a radical nihilation of myself and of a radical, internal negation of the in-itself and all affected from the point of view of a freely posited end. That is what we mean by the situation.”
- Dominic Duckett




Enter email address to receive notifications of new posts.

Join 138 other followers

Jonesxxx on Twitter

Images

Window

Self Portrait

Sunset

Low Tide

Low Tide

Yonge  Street

Rainy Window

Yacht

Fridge

Back Packs & Sausage Dog

More Photos
May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 138 other followers