<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quotations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingbollocks.net/quotations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingbollocks.net</link>
	<description>The Nature of Now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesxxx</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/quotations/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesxxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?page_id=164#comment-652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to take issue with this argument that “it&#039;s” is not possessive. “Nigel&#039;s” is possessive. So could the argument that “it&#039;s” is not possessive be based on the fact that “it” cannot be a person? What if we were talking about an animal? The dog&#039;s bone. “It&#039;s” bone or “its” bone? The rules tell us that it&#039;s “its” but is this merely based on the fact that the dog is not human? What if the dog were a male dog? Fred&#039;s bone would be acceptable. So the “its” rule is not based on the humanity of the possessor but on stating a definitive gender.

It&#039;s a ridiculous rule!

I heard some nitwit actually telephone in to the BBC last week and complain that presenters kept using the term “slash” when spelling out a web site. The caller complained that there is “no such thing as a slash” only a “back slash” or “forward slash”. Poppycock! The man was a absurd twit. Of course there is such a thing as a slash. Both forward and back slashes are examples of slashes. And since the only slash which works for a URL is a forward slash there is no need to describe the slash precisely. God knows why this man wasted his time on such piffle, God knows why people waste their time on correcting “it&#039;s” and God knows why I am wasting my time on writing this rebuttal. I guess we&#039;re all absurd twits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to take issue with this argument that “it&#8217;s” is not possessive. “Nigel&#8217;s” is possessive. So could the argument that “it&#8217;s” is not possessive be based on the fact that “it” cannot be a person? What if we were talking about an animal? The dog&#8217;s bone. “It&#8217;s” bone or “its” bone? The rules tell us that it&#8217;s “its” but is this merely based on the fact that the dog is not human? What if the dog were a male dog? Fred&#8217;s bone would be acceptable. So the “its” rule is not based on the humanity of the possessor but on stating a definitive gender.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a ridiculous rule!</p>
<p>I heard some nitwit actually telephone in to the BBC last week and complain that presenters kept using the term “slash” when spelling out a web site. The caller complained that there is “no such thing as a slash” only a “back slash” or “forward slash”. Poppycock! The man was a absurd twit. Of course there is such a thing as a slash. Both forward and back slashes are examples of slashes. And since the only slash which works for a URL is a forward slash there is no need to describe the slash precisely. God knows why this man wasted his time on such piffle, God knows why people waste their time on correcting “it&#8217;s” and God knows why I am wasting my time on writing this rebuttal. I guess we&#8217;re all absurd twits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenwhite</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/quotations/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jenwhite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?page_id=164#comment-643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a mental tic, Waygood, like tourette&#039;s. Ignore it because it won&#039;t go away.

Great site, my friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a mental tic, Waygood, like tourette&#8217;s. Ignore it because it won&#8217;t go away.</p>
<p>Great site, my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonesxxx</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/quotations/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonesxxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?page_id=164#comment-454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its a fiar cop :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a fiar cop <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Waygood</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/quotations/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Waygood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?page_id=164#comment-451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting website, but PLEASE  -it&#039;s (used everwhere) isn&#039;t possessive, it means &#039;it is&#039;!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting website, but PLEASE  -it&#8217;s (used everwhere) isn&#8217;t possessive, it means &#8216;it is&#8217;!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X-Ray scanners at airports &#8211; More big brother and a cancer risk too &#171; Talking Bollocks</title>
		<link>http://talkingbollocks.net/quotations/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X-Ray scanners at airports &#8211; More big brother and a cancer risk too &#171; Talking Bollocks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingbollocks.wordpress.com/?page_id=164#comment-322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Quotations [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quotations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

