Posts Tagged ‘narcissist

03
May
12

Blair? Back in Politics? With his reputation?

Look back in anger

Look Back In Anger

The Guardian is reporting that Tony Blair is keen to ‘re-engage’ with UK politics and has apparently hired a spin doctor as part of an attempt to raise his domestic profile.

You couldn’t make it up. Blair always played his role as if he were an actor, making loud speeches while leaving the scripting and the work to someone else. Now this delusional narcissist thinks that he can make a come back. Like some ageing movie star surrounded by sycophants he thinks he will make one last movie.

Even after the New Labour years have been shown to be a drunken binge funded by borrowing from the next generation; even after the Iraqis have been shown not to have had weapons of mass destruction; even after the MPs have been shown to have had their fingers in the till; even after his Director of Communications and Strategy (Alistair Campell) has revealed that he was suffering from alcoholism and depression during the Blair years; even after the press that supported Blair have been shown to be breaking laws and lying and the police conniving with the press and the bankers have been shown to have been funding lavish lifestyles by taking huge risks with investors money; even after Brown ran a deficit during boom years, sold half the UK gold reserves at the bottom of the market and shafted everyone’s pensions this scurrilous shit still thinks that everything was fine and Britain just needs another dose of New Labour bullshit.

I was surprised when the guy who brought war to the Middle East was made the UN Peace Envoy but I was not surprised that he went into banking after he left politics. And I am not surprised now that he wants to make a come back. When he was PM I was astonished at the gall of the man. I recall one time when he ran out of arguments he justified what he’d done by saying he had to do what he thought was right as if he had some special religious powers to tell us what was right. Remember that ghastly self riotous and patronising grin? – “Ah, OK Tony, as long as you think it’s right”.

The fact that he thinks he can return is ample proof of the delusional and narcissistic nature of the man. He thinks that his unending claims to be “passionate” about everything is sufficient substitue for practical policies. He thinks that it was him that held power and he forgets the lackeys and spin doctors that really held him in place and are now scrambling around trying to get power for themselves.

Get the old team back together…..we’ll make a comeback……it will be like the old days……yeh right! Only this time the economie is in a mess and everyone will remember how they all shafted each other last time around.

If Blair comes back then his admirers may support him thus splitting the vote for the next leader between Blair, Milliband 1 & Milliband 2. Hopefully this will finally drive a stake through the comatose, stinking remains of New Labour and that can only be a good thing. It’s almost worth getting him back just to see the fragile reputation which he retains amongst the stupid torn to shreds and the fact that he doesn’t see this coming is more proof of his tenuous grasp on reality which will only add spice to the spectacle.

Bring it on!

About these ads
05
May
10

Gordon brown, more Tommy Cooper than Napoleon

Global regulation - not bloody likely

Global regulation - not bloody likely

Today Gordon Brown warned “Either governments co-operate internationally or the unfettered markets will fail us again”. Funny that. He was quite keen on unfettered markets a few years ago. Then again, one has to follow fashion. How awful it would be if Mr. Brown wore big kipper ties or polo neck sweaters or advocated light touch regulation or declared that he had abolished boom and bust.

Ah, abolishing Boom and Bust, that was Brown’s last idea. He failed of course but he’s already forgotten about that and is  onto his next big idea: Global Regulation. Just today the Telegraph reported that: “The Prime Minister called for international co-operation on a ‘global solution’ to an economic crisis which he said was caused by the banks and not by governments. Meetings of the G8 and G20 in the coming months should agree common rules on banking liquidity, supervision and rewards.”

This goes to the core of why Gordon Brown is incompetent. This goes to the core of his neurosis. Mr. Brown is a narcissist. He believes he is one of histories “Great Men“. Remember the Freudian slip where he claimed that he had saved the world?

All economists know that the abolition of boom and bust is akin to the alchemists attempts to turn lead into gold. Any statesman should understand that getting global regulation for the banking system is also out of the question. Yes, Mr. Brown, we all know it would be a good idea for the United Nations to dictate fiscal policy to Greece. We all know that the UN should be able to ensure the liquidity requirements of China. But what if the UN wanted to dictate regulation to British banks?

The UK will not even join the Euro so we are not going to hand regulatory powers to any international body. Just last June the City Minister, Lord Myners, warned that “European proposals on banking regulation could hand greater political control of Britain’s vital financial services industry to the EU if left unchecked.” Yet Gordon Brown thinks he can reinvent The Man From Uncle. What next we have to ask? A perpetual motion machine perhaps?

Gordon Brown has a Napoleon complex but  he is more Tommy Cooper than Napoleon. Endlessly claiming he can perform miracles but endlessly cocking it up. Just like that. Just like Dostoevsky’s “Idiot” you just know he will knock over the Chinese Vase.

Mr. Brown has a massively over rated view of himself. He is impractical and lacks judgement because his vainglorious naivete always makes him go for an idealistic and unattainable solution. In short, the man is a fool.

Why the BBC is worth keeping

Why the BBC is worth keeping

Meanwhile the BBC, to my mind, are doing an excellent job covering the admitedly insipid election.

They have a web page with an “Election Calculator”. This allows you to adjust the share of the popular vote that a party might gain to see how that would “translate into seats” as they say. Of cousre this will be based on assumptions and algorithms but it is quite interesting that you have to wind the LibDems up quite considerably before they start getting any seats. In one scenario I ramped the popular vote up to 37.3% for the LibDems (Con:30.6%, Lab:24.7%) yet still the LibDems did not have more seats that the Tories or Labour. I’d say the electoral system needs to be changed.

I have been in favour of proportional representation in the past but I do think it would be a mistake to break the MPs link with their constituency. At least if all else fails it is possible to go and sit in front of your MP and harangue him. So these days I think that we should move to a Single Transferrable vote for the common and have PR for the House of Lords. However, I would have long terms for the H of L to allow them some independence from the party whips. I’d have the election at the same time as the Commons but only every other election would you get to vote for the Lords.




Enter email address to receive notifications of new posts.

Join 138 other followers

Jonesxxx on Twitter

Images

More Photos
May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 138 other followers